| Policy Futures in Education |
ISSN 1478-2103 | |
Volume 5 Number 4 2007
| |
Other
issues available | Journal
home page | Publisher
home page |
|
|
|
CONTENTS [click
on author's name for abstract and full text]
|
|
|
|
Joseph Agassi & Ronald
Swartz. Educating Elites in Democratic Societies: a dialogue,
pages 424‑430
Richard Kahn & Douglas Kellner. Paulo
Freire and Ivan Illich: technology, politics and the reconstruction
of education, pages 431‑448
Andrea Liesner. Governmentality, European
Politics and the Neo-liberal Reconstruction of German Universities,
pages 449‑459
Costas Aggelakos. The Cross-thematic Approach
and the ‘New’ Curricula of Greek Compulsory Education: review
of an incompatible relationship, pages 460‑467
Ingrid Henning Loeb. Development and Change
in Swedish Municipal Adult Education: occupational life history
studies and four genealogies of context, pages 468‑477
Tomas Hellström. The Varieties
of University Entrepreneurialism: thematic patterns and ambiguities
in Swedish university strategies, pages 478‑490
Timothy Murphy. Jack Mezirow and Perspective
Transformation: toward an understanding of Irish educational policy
within a European framework, pages 491‑496
Paul Theobald & Jim Knotwell. A Communitarian
Critique of the Warfare State: implications for the twenty-first-century
university, pages 497‑506
Graham E. Higgs & John Budd. Toward
an Authentic Ethos for Online Higher Education, pages 507‑515
Aybek Gorey. Inequity in the Australian
Education System, pages 516‑518
Ana Canen. Multiculturalism and a Research
Perspective in Initial Teacher Education: possible dialogues,
pages 519‑534
Linda J. Graham. Towards Equity
in the Futures Market: curriculum as a condition of access, pages
535‑555
Anthony Green. Neoconservatism English-style:
back to the future with remoralizing voices for education?, pages
556‑566
Kent den Heyer & Andrew Pifel. Extending
the Responsibilities for Schools beyond the School Door, pages
567‑580
BOOK REVIEWS VIEW
FULL TEXT
Declining by Degrees: higher education at risk (Richard
H. Hersh & John Merrow, Eds), reviewed by Casey E. George-Jackson,
pages 581‑584
Inventing the Modern Self and John Dewey: modernities and the
traveling of pragmatism in education (Thomas S. Popkewitz,
Ed.), reviewed by Seamus Mulryan, pages 584‑586
doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.581

|
|
Educating Elites in Democratic Societies:
a dialogue
|
|
JOSEPH AGASSI Tel Aviv University, Israel,
and York University, Toronto, Canada
RONALD SWARTZ Oakland University, Rochester, USA
|
|
doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.424
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This dialogue centers on the
following questions: (1) How can schools help a society select
or identify new elites who are hopefully as good as and perhaps
even better than those individuals who belong to the existing
elite system?, and (2) How can we create learning situations that
provide the most general learner with a broad basic education?
The first question is rejected as highly inadequate and unsatisfactory
partly because it makes a number of mistaken assumptions about
how schools can best meet the educational needs in modern countries
(such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada). The
second question is deemed extremely worthwhile; it should be at
the heart of educational dialogues in liberal democratic societies.
The discussion is mainly about the desirability of replacing the
first problem (of selecting new elites) with the second problem
(of a broad basic education) by the way of commentary on the development
of Western educational thought from Plato to Popper and beyond.
A major aim of this dialogue is to upgrade the way elites in liberal
democratic societies attempt to reform and improve our educational
institutions.
|
|
Paulo Freire and Ivan Illich: technology,
politics and the reconstruction of education
|
|
RICHARD KAHN & DOUGLAS KELLNER University
of North Dakota, Grand Forks, USA, and University of California,
Los Angeles, USA
|
doi: 10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.431
| | VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This article examines the theories
of education and technology held by two of the most important
philosophers of education during the last few decades, Paulo Freire
and Ivan Illich. These two related thinkers each charted a unique
approach to the questions surrounding modern education and technology,
and despite their widely acknowledged brilliance, and in Freire’s
case the establishment of an entire field of critical pedagogy
throughout North America, almost no attention has been paid to
examining their views on educational technology. This article
fills that important gap and attempts to dialectically mediate
their two positions towards a broader critique of media culture
and the role of educational technology generally. By utilizing
both Freire and Illich, it is argued, a critical pedagogy of technology
can be reconstructed that is capable of speaking to today’s needs,
and this critical pedagogy itself can be reconstructive of the
current terrain in education as it works to overcome inequalities
through the appropriate use of technology and the establishment
of critical consciousness on the issues surrounding technology
and society.
|
|
Governmentality, European Politics and the
Neo-liberal Reconstruction of German Universities
|
|
ANDREA LIESNER University of Hamburg,
Germany
| doi: 10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.449
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This article deals with the governmental strategies basic to
the construction of the European Higher Education Area within
the Bologna Process. With regard to the actual reconstruction
of German universities, these strategies are verified on a structural
level, in individual and collective subject relations and also
in the subject matter which is to be taught and learned. The introduction
of standardized quality assurance procedures, the promotion of
entrepreneurial forms of subjectivation and the dividing of knowledge
into functional modules are powerful instruments which combine
to form a reduced understanding of what is supposed to be economic
with a universal claim. Now, after the first half of the Bologna
Process, some possible effects of these strategies are visible.
From an educational perspective, there are two corresponding tendencies
in particular which are noteworthy: while the knowledge of educational
experts outside the university is devalued by a common prudentialism,
educational sciences within the German universities are trivialized
by structures and curricula which tend to obstruct the production
of new dimensions of knowledge and to curtail the possibilities
of scientific scepticism and critique.
|
|
The Cross-thematic Approach and the ‘New’
Curricula of Greek Compulsory Education: review of an incompatible
relationship
|
|
COSTAS AGGELAKOS Ionian University,
Corfu, Greece
|
doi: 10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.460
| | VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
Compulsory Greek education has long shown its need for revision.
The Greek Pedagogical Institute (GPI) has presented the cross-thematic
approach as a panacea, yet further changes are necessary in terms
of experiential learning, school subject demarcation, teaching
time management, teaching material, and the student/educator role.
This article examines whether these changes are incorporated in
the recent educational system revision, which resulted in widespread
confusion, a national debate, and the publication of A
Cross-thematic Curriculum Framework for Compulsory Education
(DEPPS). A speech analysis of GPI leadership indicates
the exaggerated, fictionalised, and ideological use of the term
‘cross-thematic’. Futhermore, detailed analysis demonstrates that
the new ‘cross-thematic’ curricula reproduce the 1999 curricula,
making no major changes to traditional school subject demarcation,
or teaching time management. New curriculum elements are also
problematic; the fundamental cross-thematic concepts are vague
and haphazard, while the recommended cross-thematic activities
(projects) are undermined by poor examples or inadequate allotted
teaching time. Moreover, the ‘new’ curricula follow the goal-setting
model, which leads to a multiplicity of teaching objectives and
to increased content quantity, thus impeding schoolbook writing.
Most importantly, the suggested integration of the cross-thematic
approach in Greek schools is not ideologically neutral.
|
|
Development and Change in Swedish Municipal
Adult Education: occupational life history studies and four genealogies
of context
|
|
INGRID HENNING LOEB Faculty of Education,
Göteborg University, Sweden
|
doi: 10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.468
| | VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This article is based on the
author’s dissertation work on development and change in Swedish
municipal adult education (MAE), investigated through occupational
life history studies of four teachers in different municipalities
who have worked in MAE since the mid 1970s. Three periods of development
– three ‘eras’ – in MAE have been identified in terms of its relationship
to the state, comprising two restructuring shifts: (1) from centralization
to decentralization in the early 1990s, and (2) the establishment
of quasi-marketization of adult education in the late 1990s, with
a variety of adult education providers, municipal boards and procurement
processes. Comprehensive analysis of the four teacher trajectories
and their genealogies of context has been carried out relating
to the three eras, and concepts on mechanisms for institutional
isomorphism have been used for analysis on why and how the different
MAE organizations that the four teachers work in have developed
in similar or homogenous ways. In the article, tensions and contestation
in development and change in the local context are made explicit,
and are analysed and provide the basis for problematizing late
national reformation and restructuring efforts.
|
|
The Varieties of University Entrepreneurialism:
thematic patterns and ambiguities in Swedish university strategies
|
|
TOMAS HELLSTRÖM University of Oslo,
Norway
| doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.478
| | VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
The idea of the ‘entrepreneurial
university’ has captured the imagination of academics and policy
makers for some time now. However, most of the recent writings
on the subject have tended to emphasize technology transfer in
terms of spin-off creation and licensing. This article takes its
point of departure in the strategy formulations of Swedish public
universities to inquire into the varieties of university entrepreneurialism,
that is the breadth of the spectrum from short- to medium-term
capitalization from innovation, to social outreach and organizational
cultural change. The study builds on a qualitative content analysis
of strategy documents which explicates and discusses ongoing and
planned third mission activities – including commercialization
and outreach – at Swedish universities. The strategy categories
derived from this study include (1) support infrastructures for
commercialization, (2) internal knowledge building and cultural
change, and (3) outreach and sectoral cooperative activities,
as well as eight subcategories. The article contributes an explication
and a discussion of these categories, and concludes with a number
of issues relating to the way universities may develop these strategic
dimensions given the conflicting or ambiguous goals present in
the notion of the entrepreneurial university.
|
|
Jack Mezirow and Perspective Transformation:
toward an understanding of Irish educational policy within a European
framework
|
|
TIMOTHY MURPHY National University of
Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| doi: 10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.491
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This article considers important
junctures in the evolution of Irish educational policy. For this
purpose, the author makes appropriate references to the theoretical
framework of Jack Mezirow. In particular, Mezirow’s treatment
of ‘meaning schemes’, ‘meaning perspectives’ and ‘paradigm shifts’
are applied toward a better understanding of recent developments
in educational policy there. The principal ‘paradigms’ or ‘frames
of reference’ which underpin the formulation of educational policy
are considered. It is hoped that such an analysis will contribute
to the on-going debate about the future role of education in society
in Europe generally. Readers from outside Ireland have an opportunity
to reflect on the various influences that have impacted the evolution
of their educational policies, and may identify resonances with
specific developments in the Irish context, as well as points
of departure.
|
|
A Communitarian Critique of the Warfare
State: implications for the twenty-first-century university
|
|
PAUL THEOBALD Buffalo State College,
USA
JIM KNOTWELL Wayne State College, USA
|
|
doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.497
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This article contends that the
relatively recent academic movement known as communitarianism
can serve as a policy guide that could work catalytically on American
cultural development of the sort that would loosen the tight military-industrial
connection and in so doing aid the dismantling of the ‘warfare
state.’ After chronicling the development of our current cultural
circumstances, the authors demonstrate the possible contributions
of communitarianism to a culture that raises community welfare
among its list of policy priorities. They further argue that the
deployment of community-oriented policy will require universities
that engage students relative to the merits of communitarian theory.
|
|
Toward an Authentic Ethos for Online Higher
Education
|
|
GRAHAM E. HIGGS Columbia College
of Missouri, USA
JOHN BUDD University of Missouri, Columbia, USA
|
|
doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.507
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
The influence of capitalism on
education’s telos is a subject of critical concern. This article
argues that a neo-liberal ideal that markets should determine
educational efficacy and process is antithetical to the cultural
good. The authors describe education as fundamentally teleological,
responsible for defining, building and sustaining civilization.
They further argue that an illusory ethos built upon the purely
instrumental goals of the marketplace is replacing the authentic
ethos for culture and identity building found in education’s traditional
telos. The authors hope to open a discussion that addresses the
philosophical assumptions which underlie the emerging and burgeoning
industry in online higher education. A call is made for a critical
examination of the instrumental ethos and it is claimed that an
authentic ethos will necessarily include a discourse that questions
the goals for culture found in education.
|
|
Inequity in the Australian Education System
|
|
AYBEK GOREY Monash University, Melbourne,
Australia
|
|
doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.516
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This article deals with the current
situation of the Australian education system- particularly the
public schools in disadvantaged areas. Research undertaken in
the last decade show that while Australia has developed intensively
in economic terms in the last ten years, inequality has spread
nonetheless. Furthermore, there are legal barriers for public
schools in obtaining funds unlike private schools. The article
aims to assure the policymakers that pumping more funds into the
system would not be as effective as investing in to create a caring
community through motivated and well-resourced teachers.
|
|
Multiculturalism and a Research Perspective
in Initial Teacher Education: possible dialogues
|
|
ANA CANEN Federal University of Rio
de Janeiro, Brazil
|
|
doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.519
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This article describes action
research within a multicultural pedagogical praxis orientation
in a teacher education course at a higher education institution
in Brazil during the academic year 2003. The narrative draws on
the ways in which the course sought to develop a research perspective
that could equip student teachers with elements that allow them
to interrogate the constructions of social and cultural inequalities,
as well as of the process of research itself and the impact of
the researcher as a multicultural identity. The meanings, potentials
and challenges of the research undertaken are discussed and should
be relevant comparatively, not only because they highlight tensions
of multiculturalism and seek to refine the concept of multicultural
research, but also because local narratives reflect imbricated
global issues that go beyond national borders, particularly concerning
the role of research within teacher education in highly multicultural
countries.
|
|
Towards Equity in the Futures Market: curriculum
as a condition of access
|
|
LINDA J. GRAHAM University of Sydney,
Australia
|
|
doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.535
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This article provides a consideration
of the problem of equity in education. In the first part of the
discussion, the author draws on philosophical and sociological
literature to consider what equity means and its implications
for education. Drawing on work by Burbules, Lord and Sherman,
she looks to curriculum as a condition of access and the importance
of learning support structures in bringing about equitable educational
outcomes, conceived in terms of Amy Gutmann’s democratic threshold.
The article offers a conceptual-theoretical model for thinking
about the resourcing and curricular requirements for equity in
contemporary liberal democratic societies, contrasting the social
and economic policy mixes employed by governments situated at
different points along a liberty/equality continuum.
|
|
Neoconservatism English-style: back to the
future with remoralizing voices for education?
|
|
ANTHONY GREEN Institute of Education,
University of London, United Kingdom
|
|
doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.556
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
This articles addresses the conservative
dynamics of ‘neoconservatism’ in the field of education with particular
reference to possible complementarities between the ‘voices’ of
two, seemingly alternative public intellectuals. These dynamics
are conceptualized as part of what is, in social realist mode,
enmoralization, a term coined to specify part of the structures
and processes of realizing morale, by which remoralization
works in this context to ‘neo’ conservative effects. Here, the
post-postmodernist rediscovery of the moral and the ethical,
the remoralization agenda, works to TINA by supporting the morale
of the fatalism of capitalism. In the context of Blairite New
Labour education policy, this ideology critique suggests ways
in which neoconservatism articulates neoliberalism where agendas
are set to prioritize authority over equity and social justice
and to foreshorten the search for radical alternatives for policy
futures.
|
|
Extending the Responsibilities for Schools
beyond the School Door
|
|
KENT DEN HEYER University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Canada
ANDREW PIFEL Kent State University, USA
|
|
doi:
10.2304/pfie.2007.5.4.567
|
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
|
In this article, the authors
use qualitative and quantitative research to identify the performance
of social actors whose decisions impact students and teachers,
elucidate a set of measurements for their performance, and offer
both a theoretical and research justification for these measurements.
The work challenges two faulty assumptions behind the No Child
Left Behind (NCLB) legislation that make it more likely that school
curricula will continue to be unrepresentative of diverse experiences
and that far too many children will continue to attend schools
under unnecessarily trying conditions. The first faulty assumption
is the legislation’s location of school ‘problems’ or the ‘problems
with schools’ as beginning and ending at the school door. A second
assumption that the authors’ development of research-based rubrics
seeks to challenge is a prevalent attitude in US society regarding
individual responsibility for personal success or failure, which
supports the thrust of NCLB in the public imagination. Like the
ill-distribution of economic possibilities despite people’s hard
work, rubrics holding the various public stakeholders in education
are required to appropriately expand responsibility for student
success beyond schools and teachers.
|
|