| Policy Futures in Education |
ISSN 1478-2103 | |
Volume 4 Number 2 2006 | |
Other
issues available | Journal
home page | Publisher
home page |
|
|
| CONTENTS |
| [click on author's name for
abstract and full text] | | Theme:
Doing Diversity Work Guest Editors: SARA AHMED & ELAINE SWAN
Sara Ahmed & Elaine Swan. Introduction. Doing Diversity, pages
96‑100 DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.96 VIEW
FULL TEXT Heidi Safia Mirza. Transcendence over
Diversity: black women and the academy, pages 101‑113 Shona
Hunter. Working for Equality and Diversity in Adult and Community Learning:
leadership, representation and racialised ‘outsiders’ within, pages 114‑127
Audrey Osler. Changing Leadership in Contexts of Diversity:
visibility, invisibility and democratic ideals, pages 128‑144
Cecily Jones. Falling between the Cracks: what diversity
means for black women in higher education, pages 145‑159 Lewis
Turner. Face Values: visible/invisible governors on the board and organisational
responses to the race equality agenda, pages 160‑171 Rosemary
Crawley. Diversity and the Marginalisation of Black Women’s Issues, pages
172‑184 Rosemary Deem & Louise Morley.
Diversity in the Academy? Staff Perceptions of Equality Policies in Six Contemporary
Higher Education Institutions, pages 185‑202 Sanjay
Sharma. Teaching Diversity: im/possible pedagogy, pages 203‑216

|
| Transcendence over Diversity: black women in
the academy | | HEIDI
SAFIA MIRZA Middlesex University, Enfield, United Kingdom |
DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.101 | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST | |
Universities, like many major public institutions,
have embraced the notion of ‘diversity’ virtually uncritically – it is seen as
a moral good in itself. But what happens to those who come to represent ‘diversity’
– the black and minority ethnic groups targeted to increase the institutions’
thirst for global markets and aversion to accusations of institutional racism?
Drawing on existing literature which analyses the process of marginalisation in
higher education, this article explores the individual costs to black and female
academic staff regardless of the discourse on diversity. However, despite the
exclusion of staff, black and minority ethnic women are also entering higher education
in relatively large numbers as students. Such grass-roots educational urgency
transcends the dominant discourse on diversity and challenges presumptions inherent
in top-down initiatives such as widening participation. Such a collective movement
from the bottom up shows the importance of understanding black female agency when
unpacking the complex dynamics of gendered and racialised exclusion. Black women’s
desire for education and learning makes possible a reclaiming of higher education
from creeping instrumentalism and reinstates it as a radical site of resistance
and refutation. |
| Working for Equality and Diversity in Adult
and Community Learning: leadership, representation and racialised ‘outsiders within’ |
| SHONA HUNTER Lancaster University, United
Kingdom | DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.114 |
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST | |
This article uses empirical material from a qualitative study of adult and
community learning (ACL) to explore issues around leading for equality and diversity
in educational organisations. What the author is interested in is the way that
the commitment to a ‘community’ context in ACL opens up (or keeps open) certain
possibilities for ‘diverse’ educational leaders because of the connection it draws
between pedagogic practice and the politics of equality. By calling
for a mainstreaming of political knowledge around unequal social relations, participants
problematise notions of leadership currently circulating in education. Whilst
homogenising tendencies in their accounts may be read as going against the very
grain of contemporary debates around the recognition of ‘difference’ and diversity,
they also pose significant challenges to neo-liberal imaginings of diversity. |
| Changing Leadership in Contexts of Diversity:
visibility, invisibility and democratic ideals | | AUDREY
OSLER University of Leeds, United Kingdom | DOI:
10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.128 | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST | |
This article considers the degree to which
recent changes in school leadership discourse, to incorporate diversity, reflect
a changing professional culture among school leadership trainers and researchers
in England. It examines the extent to which equalities legislation has had an
impact on school leadership agendas and considers what can be learned from school
leaders, including those from visible minorities, to inform policy in this field.
The national culture is shaped by patterns of forgetting, so that diversity is
represented as something new, and potentially disintegrative. Nineteenth- and
early twentieth-century leaders of colour, who were once highly visible, are made
invisible through the processes of history. Parallels are drawn with today’s school
leaders and current educational leadership research agendas. Research commissioned
by the National College for School Leadership adopts a cross-cultural paradigm.
Cross-cultural approaches which do not engage fully with the legal imperative
to promote race equality and which overlook deep-seated patterns of inequality
are unlikely to meet the needs of a multicultural democracy. Many school leaders
are concerned with racial justice and recognise their responsibility as citizens
to address racism and inequality. Racism is an anti-democratic force, serving
to undermine the full and equal participation of citizens. Anti-racism is thus
an essential element of democratic practice within a multicultural nation state.
The article concludes by arguing that school leadership researchers, trainers
and head teachers need to adopt new patterns of remembering which build on the
experience and wisdom of head teachers from all sectors of society who are engaged
in the practical citizenship task of creating equitable schools and building an
effective multicultural democracy. |
| Falling
between the Cracks: what diversity means for black women in higher education |
| CECILY JONES University of Warwick, United
Kingdom | DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.145 |
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST | |
The concepts of social justice and diversity
have attained currency in political discourse and in organisational policy. Since
the 1960s, the concept of social justice has been at the forefront of governmental
drives to eradicate social inequalities, delivered through a framework of equality
of opportunity. Recent years have, however, witnessed a shift away from the ‘traditional’
equal opportunity model of achieving equality towards the adoption of diversity
management as a strategy of organisational policy. This shift comes in the wake
of the increasing recognition of the diverse nature of employees in the workplace.
A cornerstone of diversity management is its stress on the recognition and valuing
of individual rather than social-group difference. An emphasis on individual difference
may, however, carry profound consequences for the achievement of equality, for
it may in fact serve to obscure and exacerbate the structural causes of inequality
and, moreover, it may be an inadequate approach to countering the racialised discrimination
and disadvantage encountered by black female academics. This article therefore
asks: what are the implications of this shift for black and minority ethnic women
academics in higher education in the United Kingdom today? Is it possible for
higher education institutions and other employers to initiate a diversity policy
that not only recognises differences, but at the same time ensures the delivery
of policies and practices that challenge inequality? |
| Face
Values: visible/invisible governors on the board and organisational responses
to the race equality agenda | | LEWIS
TURNER University of Lancaster, United Kingdom | DOI:
10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.160 | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST | |
This article explores institutional responses
to the race equality agenda in the context of further education (FE) and sixth
form colleges. More specifically, it examines the experiences of black and minority
ethnic governors within the environment of recent legislative changes to improve
the representation of black and minority ethnic people in governing bodies and
senior management within the sector. Using data from interviews with black and
minority ethnic governors and diversity managers, the article explores the negotiations
that participants made within these institutions as black and minority ethnic
people. This exploration is framed by a problematic of visibility and invisibility
– a ‘double bind’ which can restrict the role that black and minority ethnic governors
are able to undertake within some college environments. The author claims that
the modalities of these informal dynamics inform and affirm a conceptualisation
of colleges as the ‘proper’ location of white male subjectivity. |
| Diversity and the Marginalisation of Black Women’s
Issues | | ROSEMARY CRAWLEY |
DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.172 | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST | |
This article describes and evaluates information
gained from a programme of workshops that took place during the late 1990s for
approximately one hundred black women who originated from the African diaspora
and worked in the social housing sector. The programme was designed to utilise
group working in order to promote feminist thinking and self-actualisation from
a black female perspective. Most of the participants saw it as a means of personal
and career development. In the event it also provided valuable research information.
Stories were told and feelings explored about the effect on black women of living
and working in a predominantly white society that publicly acknowledges itself
as diverse but holds on to its economic privileges and notions of its innate superiority.
The participants focused on the impact on black women of diversity as it is practised
in employer organisations, diversity training, ascribed images and roles and interactions
with family and community. |
| Diversity in the Academy? Staff Perceptions
of Equality Policies in Six Contemporary Higher Education Institutions |
| ROSEMARY DEEM University of Bristol, United
Kingdom LOUISE MORLEY University of Sussex, United Kingdom |
DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.185 | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST | |
The article is based on recent research involving
qualitative case studies of staff experiences of equality policies in six English,
Scottish and Welsh higher education institutions (HEIs). Recent changes to UK
legislation (e.g. on ‘race’ and disability) and a series of European Union employment
directives (including on religion and sexual orientation) have caused more attention
to be paid to equality policies and their implementation in higher education.
The wider context for equality policies has also changed, from a predominant focus
on individuals and redistributive equality policies to viewing inequality as a
generic and relative concept which can be policy-mainstreamed, with greater concentration
on organisational cultures and diversity and a focus on recognitional rather than
redistributive approaches to inequality. The article uses the authors’ recent
research findings to consider how higher education institution employees who participated
in the study understood notions of equality and diversity. There is a particular
focus on whether different forms of inequality are seen to be interconnected,
whether diversity is seen as desirable by most employees interviewed, the potential
tensions and conflicts between equality policies applying to students and those
concerned with staff and the visions of equitable HEIs of the future held by senior
managers. It is suggested that whilst all HEIs studied had equality policies and
senior managers who have benefited from equality training, nevertheless the shift
away from redistributional notions of inequality (except in respect of occupational
inequality) towards greater emphasis on recognitional forms, the tensions between
student and staff equality issues, and the pursuit of organisational diversity
may reflect a relative depoliticisation of the staff equality agenda in higher
education. |
| Teaching Diversity – im/possible pedagogy |
| SANJAY SHARMA Brunel University, United
Kingdom | DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2006.4.2.203 |
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | CHINESE
ABSTRACT 中文摘要
| BACK TO CONTENTS LIST | |
A turn to ‘cultural diversity’ in the curriculum
offers a multitude of opportunities for educational practitioners: questioning
Eurocentric knowledge; deconstructing ‘marginality’; recognising the ensuing hybridities,
intercultural dialogues and encounters in a globalizing world. However, this article
questions the current representational pedagogies of cultural and media studies
in relation to how they address the epistemic and political grounds upon which
the antagonisms of multiculture are played out. It argues that a point of departure
for teaching diversity needs to acknowledge the contestations of racialized difference,
and the pedagogic im/possibility of encountering otherness outside of domination.
A key aim of the article is to explore the entangled politics and practice of
teaching diversity, through scrutinizing the challenges of using a ‘multicultural’
film such as Bend it Like Beckham (dir. Gurinder Chadha, 2002). It has
become increasingly common in cultural and media studies to use ‘ethnically marked’
texts to examine and deconstruct the dynamics of cultural-racial identity formation
and representations of otherness. The article interrogates the productive possibilities
and limits of such approaches. |
|