|
Policy Futures in Education |
ISSN 1478-2103 | |
Volume 1 Number 3 2003 | |
Other
issues available | Journal
home page | Publisher
home page |
|
|
| CONTENTS |
| [click on author's name for
abstract and full text] | |
Theme: Educational Futures - new utopian thinking in education Editors:
WALTER HUMES & MICHAEL A. PETERS Michael A. Peters & Walter Humes.
Editorial. Educational Futures: utopias and heterotopias, pages 428‑440
VIEW
FULL TEXT Ivana Milojevic. Hegemonic and Marginalised
Utopias in the Contemporary Western World, pages 440‑466 Henry
Giroux. Dystopian Nightmares and Educated Hopes: the return of the pedagogical
and the promise of democracy, pages 467‑487 David Geoffrey
Smith. On Enfraudening the Public Sphere, the Futility of Empire and the
Future of Knowledge after ‘America’, pages 488‑503 Zeus
Leonardo. Reality on Trial: notes on ideology, education, and utopia,
pages 504‑525 Mark Olssen. Totalitarianism and
the ‘Repressed’ Utopia of the Present: moving beyond Hayek, Popper and Foucault,
pages 526‑552 Michael Young. Curriculum Studies
and the Problem of Knowledge: updating the Enlightenment?, pages 553‑564 Robert
A. Davis. Education, Utopia and the Limits of Enlightenment, pages 565‑585 Kay
Livingston. What is the Future for National Policy Making in Education
in the Context of an Enlarged European Union? , pages 586‑600
REVIEW
SYMPOSIUM Michael A. Peters, Christopher Winch, Walter Humes. Reviewing
the Reviewers: the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development review
of educational research and development in England, pages 601‑610 VIEW
FULL TEXT
BOOK REVIEWS, pages 611‑621
VIEW FULL TEXT

|
| Hegemonic and Marginalised Educational Utopias
in the Contemporary Western World | | IVANA
MILOJEVIC University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia |
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
| This article discusses whether utopian
thinking in education has really disappeared, as is often argued. The argument
is here made that while overtly utopian thinking has lost its legitimacy among
social sciences and education theorists and practitioners, the influence of various
utopian discourses on educational policies and practices remains strong. The first
part of this article contextualises the present state of utopian thinking by overviewing
its historical development. The second part discusses this in the context of education.
The third part raises the issue of hegemonic utopias that present as ‘realist’
discourses about the future. The fourth section brings into discussion marginalised
utopias, and asks the question if there are any spaces left for utopias that most
deeply challenge patriarchal and Western assumptions about what constitutes knowledge,
history, future and ideal education. The article concludes by arguing that all
‘regimes of educational truths’ whether labelled ‘realistic’ or ‘utopian’ draw
their inspiration from a particular image of the future, an image that always
includes at least some elements of the utopian. |
| Dystopian
Nightmares and Educated Hopes: the return of the pedagogical and the promise of
democracy | | HENRY GIROUX Penn
State University, University Park, USA | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
| This article examines how the political,
economic, and ideological policies under neoliberalism in the United States are
being used to wage a war against almost every facet of American life not directly
governed by the logic and values of the market. War has become the central motif
of the dystopian vision of neoliberalism and the effects of such an assault on
the domestic front have been overshadowed by the war in Iraq. The article further
argues that it is crucial that educators reclaim a revitalized notion of politics
that gets beyond the discourse of critique, one which all too often in reductionistic
fashion emphasizes either the crushing effects of domination or views people largely
as victims. A more radical politics must consider embracing a notion of hope rooted
in pedagogical work that both extends the sites of pedagogy and recognizes the
importance of cultural politics as a preconditions for both creating revitalized
democratic public spaces, social movements, and the possibility of social action. |
| On Enfraudening the Public Sphere, the Futility
of Empire and the Future of Knowledge after 'America' | |
DAVID GEOFFREY SMITH International Forum on Education
and Society, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | BACK TO CONTENTS LIST | | This
article examines various ways the current Bush Administration in the USA is conducting
an information war to mask its larger imperial aims. The implications of this
for public education and for the meaning of public knowledge are explored, particularly
through Enrique Dussel's analysis of Euro-American modernity. The 'myth' of modernity
has two faces, the surface face of 'emancipative reason' and the historically
silenced underside face of 'sacrificial reason.' Understanding the continuity
between these is foundational for any new global ethic, and for the epistemic
conditions of future human knowing. |
| Reality
on Trial: notes on ideology, education, and utopia | | ZEUS
LEONARDO California State University, Long Beach, USA |
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
| The concept of utopia has been described
as a distortion of reality in the positive direction. On the other hand, its dialectical
counterpart, ideology, has been described as a distortion of reality in the negative
direction. Each concept has been defined in exclusive terms from the other, but
as discourses they have become dependent on each other, albeit in a negative relationship.
First, this article analyzes the four moments of Althusser’s theory that ideology
is unscientific, humanist, like-the-unconscious, and finally as having material
effects. Althusser’s theory provides a compendium for the recent ruminations on
the concept of ideology and is representative of the propensity to define it in
pejorative terms. Second, the article surveys More, Saint-Simon, and Fourier’s
thoughts on utopia. At its minimum, utopia has been useful in imagining a reality
that is better than its current form. At its best, utopia shatters the current
reality. Third, the article concludes by building an incipient theory of ideology
as utopia, or the utopian moment of ideology critique. The article argues that
ideology critique often projects an alternative reality, a utopia, and that utopian
thinking is inherently a form of ideology critique. |
| Totalitarianism
and the ‘Repressed’ Utopia of the Present: moving beyond Hayek, Popper and Foucault |
| MARK OLSSEN University of Surrey, Guildford,
United Kingdom | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
| This article starts by reviewing
the negative account of utopian thinking in dominant liberal western political
theory, through the positing of a link between utopianism and totalitarianism,
as present in the writings of liberal writers like Hayek, Popper, Berlin and others.
As such, this article constitutes a critique of the liberal theories of utopianism
and totalitarianism as well as positing alternative conceptions. It uses Michel
Foucault’s views to advance beyond the liberal mind-set in order to rehabilitate
the concept of utopia as both a substantive and methodological conception for
both democratic and educational theory, and argues for a revival of utopian thinking
as necessary for extending and deepening democracy in the world post 9/11. |
| Curriculum Studies and the Problem of Knowledge:
updating the Enlightenment? | | MICHAEL
YOUNG Institute of Education, University of London, United Kingdom |
| VIEW
FULL TEXT | BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
| This article argues that, contrary
to widespread views in the philosophy of education, the acquisition of knowledge,
and therefore the nature of the knowledge to be acquired at school, is central
to any debate about a future curriculum. It illustrates this argument with examples
from recent policies for the 14‑19 age group but suggests that the neglect
of knowledge reflects more basic flaws in contemporary educational theory. The
article reviews recent developments in terms of the principles of ‘insularity
‘ and ‘hybridity’ and goes on to argue for an alternative institutional or social
realist approach. It concludes with some brief observations on how in framing
a curriculum for the 21st century we might relate to Enlightenment ideas of reason
truth and knowledge. |
| Education, Utopia and the Limits of Enlightenment |
| ROBERT A. DAVIS University of Glasgow,
United Kingdom | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
| In many recent explanations of the
rise of modernity, Scotland has been cited as an illustration of the relationship
between the growth of mass education and the influence of the Enlightenment faith
in reason and progress. This article questions the prevailing account of the advance
of education in Scotland by highlighting the impact upon it of utopian concepts
of education and society from which Scottish Enlightenment thought recoiled. Originating
in the radical theology of the Scottish Reformation, the utopian theme in Scottish
culture has been a constant source of renewal and reproach, testing the limits
of Enlightenment consensus and positing compelling alternatives to dominant educational
practice. |
| What is the Future for National Policy Making
in Education in the Context of an Enlarged European Union? |
| KAY LIVINGSTON Quality in Education Centre, University
of Strathclyde, United Kingdom | | VIEW
FULL TEXT | BACK TO CONTENTS LIST |
| This article considers the impact
of European policy making on national education systems. It discusses a selection
of recent initiatives taken by the European Union (EU) and the growing emphasis
on joint action in the Member States in the field of education. In particular,
the article is concerned with the effects that common objectives, benchmarks and
quality indicators set for education at EU level have on the education agenda
in the Member States. The growing number of international studies comparing education
systems and the concern that policy makers have about their country’s place in
international league tables add to the pressure to conform to goals and standards
set at international level. For example, studies such as the Programme for International
Student Assessment publish international comparisons and attract significant media
attention. This undoubtedly puts pressure on policy makers to make changes at
a national level to improve or maintain their international standing. The article
considers a number of questions: will these trends in international cooperation
and comparison result in a loss of diversity that is evident in the education
systems in Europe today? And will they stunt the growth of innovation and creativity
within each country and ultimately lead to conformity in education? |
|